🔗 Share this article

For a brief period, Trump seemed to adopt a firm approach concerning Ukraine. Following delivering statements of "severe repercussions" last August if Putin continued obstructing ceasefire negotiations, the former president eventually introduced substantial penalties on the Russian two largest petroleum corporations, Lukoil and Rosneft. This decision significantly hindered Putin's capacity to fund his military invasion in the region.

But, through his newly presented detailed peace initiative for the conflict, which was created by both nations' representatives lacking Ukrainian or European input, Trump has clearly returned to his Russia-friendly stance.

Favoring Invasion

Trump's plan would effectively reward Putin for attacking a sovereign nation while placing the country's democracy in danger. Although strong declarations that "Ukraine's independence will be confirmed", large portions of the plan actually weaken that very independence. This constitutes a Moscow's wish would probably be a disaster for Ukraine.

Demonstrating his corporate experience, the former president persists to treat the situation in Ukraine as a simple land disagreement, implying giving Putin a part of Ukrainian soil will satisfy the leader. However, Russia's war is not only about dominating a damaged swath of industrial-devastated land in the Donbas region. Instead, it's about Ukraine's democracy – and the Russian leader's clear desire to weaken it so it stops serves as an attractive example for the Russian citizens of the accountable governance that Putin's deepening dictatorship prevents them.

Border Surrenders

Although maintaining in status the presently separated Ukrainian provinces of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, Trump's plan would compel the nation to surrender the whole Donetsk province. Beyond rewarding Russia with area that its troops have been failed to capture in exceeding a ten years of warfare, this concession would make Ukraine's defensive positions severely undermined.

This region is the place of Ukraine's much-vaunted "fortress belt", the fortified protective structures that constitute a critical impediment to Russian advances. The proposal would have Ukraine surrender these positions, giving Russian forces a clear way to Kyiv should he later choose to resume the war.

Military Limitations

Then, in a move that would make future conflict more feasible for the Russian military, the plan would force the nation to cut the scale of its military from their current 800,000 to 850,000 soldiers to a limit of this lower number. Significantly, the proposal imposes no similar limits on Russian forces.

In what appears as a gesture to Russia's efforts to portray the nation's legitimate government as extremists, the plan declares: "Every extremist doctrine and practices must be rejected and forbidden." Seemingly to highlight this aspect, it insists that "The nation will hold political contests in 100 days" of a peace deal. However, Trump places no requirement that the Russian leader endanger his authoritarian rule by allowing elections in Russia.

Defense Commitments

Admittedly, the initiative includes Russia promise not to "invade other states" and to "enshrine in regulation its position of non-aggression towards European nations and Ukraine". Yet taking into account that Putin has violated similar treaties in the previous instances – including the Budapest accord, in which the Russian government promised to honor the nation's borders in exchange for surrendering its historical nuclear weapons, and the 2014-2015 Minsk agreements, in which Moscow promised to a ceasefire and a return of captured land in the region to Kyiv – for what reason should the international community trust this commitment this time?

That is why the Ukrainian government has been so insistent on western security guarantees. Although the initiative promises a "strong joint military response" should Russia renew its aggression, and includes that "Ukraine will receive strong defense commitments", the details vary from vague to concerning. The proposal would not only deny Ukraine accession to NATO but also preclude member states from stationing troops on the nation's land, thereby precluding the peacekeeping contingent, reportedly led by European powers, on which the Ukrainian government had been depending to prevent Russia from restoring his weakened troops, rearming, and attacking again.

World Concern

Another parallel deal reportedly would provide Ukraine with a Nato-style defense commitment, in which any subsequent "significant, intentional, and sustained military assault" by the Russian Federation on Ukraine "shall be regarded as an attack threatening the tranquility of the Western nations." That suggests a military response. Yet different from a strong Ukrainian military – Ukraine's primary deterrent against additional Russian aggression – the effectiveness of the side agreement would hinge on the dedication of alliance members, like Trump, to respond through arms to Putin's aggression, something they have {not